Thursday, August 7, 2025

Plastic Negotiations and Crude Capitalism

Criminally intense lobbying by the fossil fuel industry in the drafting of a “Paris Agreement” for the Plastic Crisis should not come as a surprise, but as an alarm of consolidation of abusive power in treaty negotiations with potential consequence of replicating the Paris Agreement’s innumerable semantics-based instances of inefficacy and inertia. By basing itself at the centre of the negotiations, and outnumbering indigenous peoples and well-intentioned, radical environmental action groups, the plastics-cum-oil industry lobbyists is repeating its modus operandi of preserving its financial and extractive interests perniciously, and politically, the surrounding circumstances could not have exceeded their expectations- with the godfather enthusing the Big Oil with his “drill, baby, drill” declaration smoothening the terrain for the latter to project and document skyrocketing oil production levels. It is also not a surprise that these big fossil fuel giants have reneged on their already contestable “sustainability” and “net-zero” commitments, with now clearly investing more in fracking, drilling and extracting crude from the Shadow Lands- both onshore and offshore.

Interrogating the pervasiveness of plastic as an indispensable material commodity will unsurprisingly lead to a refined version of extractivism- Crude Capitalism as borrowed from the theorisation by Adam Hanieh. Unsurprisingly, plastic, derived as a by-product of crude oil refinement processes, is an expansion of the Big Oil’s stranglehold on the global industrial basics market- while oil and gas provide energy, plastic “creates” and conceptualises new commodities, defined by its diabolical versatility. Hanieh tracks the evolution of the petrochemical industry in Crude Capitalism, and centres militarism of World War II along with a subsequent takeover by US-based Oil giants of a predominantly German invention in the geopolitical story of plastic and other synthetic polymers including rubber.

By de-coupling commodity production from nature, there was a radical reduction in the time taken to produce commodities, and an end to any limits on the quantity and diversity of goods produced. This qualitative transformation in the substance of commodity production came with far reaching ecological implications. As synthetic materials began to accumulate in ever-increasing quantities throughout the environment, their disruptive toxic effects soon became apparent – yet another manifestation of the Great Acceleration enabled by the transition to oil.”

- Crude Capitalism

One should take cognisance of the fact that this is not the first time that corporate interests have hijacked international discussion on legal mechanisms for ecological protection. Lobbyists from Big Oil, Big Agriculture and Big Corporate have captured CoPs of the UNFCCC constantly, and even increasingly, with the host countries themselves being dependent on crude economy-derived royalties, such as Egypt, UAE and Azerbaijan. Their overshadowing interests lead to advocacy for “market-based solutions” such as the massive failure called carbon credit system, transition from coal to oil (based on the fake claim of oil being a “clean energy source”) and maintaining oil dependency for perpetuity, inter alia, rather than system overhaul and questioning of the neoliberal-industrial-oil complex paradigm. The fact that our environmental treaties are soft agreements should not be normalised; there is a set of non-legal reasons for that. These treaties, due to lobbying helped by the principles of international law and a frail enforcement/judicial mechanism, are also situated in a world where power is condensed in a few private entities, aided by the governments that are supposed to fulfil democratic mandate through preserving “public trust” and “precaution”. And, predominantly, this power emanates from control over Crude, Coal and derivatively, Plastic. While Busan failed, what happens in Geneva, unfortunately, comes with a foreboding.

[PS.- be sceptical of the term “sustainability”. In all likelihood, it is used by Big Corporate to fool you.]


Plastic Negotiations and Crude Capitalism

Criminally intense lobbying by the fossil fuel industry in the drafting of a “Paris Agreement” for the Plastic Crisis should not come as a ...